联系方式

李 帼贞

电话: +852 2533 2841 电邮 李 办公室: Hong Kong

Awards

争议解决:诉讼 - 中国(外国律所)/ 重组与破产 - 中国(外国律所)及香港

争议解决:诉讼 - 中国(外国律所)/ 重组与破产 - 中国(外国律所)及香港

争议解决:诉讼 – 香港

争议解决:诉讼 – 香港

2021 年法律 500 强诉讼国家比较指南 - 香港章节撰稿人

2021 年法律 500 强诉讼国家比较指南 - 香港章节撰稿人

李 帼贞 合伙人

联系方式

李 帼贞

李 帼贞
合伙人

电话: +852 2533 2841 电邮 李 办公室: Hong Kong

李帼贞是罗夏信律师事务所香港分所的一名合伙人。 她擅长处理有关争议性的商业破产,商业诉讼和纠纷解决,以及其它国际贸易金融纠纷案件。
  • 简介
  • 业务范围

李律师于2012年成为香港执业律师。

在加入罗夏信律师事务所之前,李律师曾就任于一家国际律师事务所的诉讼部门,在公司股东纠纷以及争议性或非争议破产案件中提供给公司债务清算人和临时清盘人专业建议有丰富的经验。

李律师在处理公司监管制度中曾协助办理香港交易中心,证券及期货事务检查中心和香港财政局名义下的各种投资事宜中也拥有丰富的经验。

另外,李律师还擅长办理国际商业贸易金融纠纷案件。她曾为众多大型中国内地银行担任律师处理有关信用证的纠纷案件。

李律师在为客户与香港仲裁中心的纠纷案件中提供仲裁建议也拥有丰富的经验。 

李律师可以用流利的英语,粤语和普通话交流。

  • 重组及破产
  • 商业诉讼
  • 合规
  • 融资

代表清算人向法院寻求有关公司资产分配的指示,涉及从价费及抵消等新问题。

代表清算人针对拥有60个下属单位资产超过2亿港币的大型集团公司的清算事宜提供法律意见,包括清算前的公司调查事宜。 

为大型公司的临时清算人提供法律意见,内容包括获取紧急禁令,以防止特定公司限制出售附属公司控股股份,对特定公司宣布股份抵押无效采取对抗行动,向法院申请,根据公司条例(清算及其他法规)的s.221条规定,对公司特定人员进行审查。

代表一家中国公司的2,000多名员工就价值超过50亿港元的香港上市公司股份进行复杂及重要的诉讼。

就与其他股东的争议向澳大利亚主要图书销售商提服务,从而申请法定干预。

代表一家荷兰主要银行向其借款人和担保人提出各种诉讼,以追回超过6,000万美元的债务。

代表一位高净值中国个人与少数股东发生的争议提供法律意见,包括与英属维尔京群岛律师合作,就2004年英属维尔京群岛商业公司法第176条的法定购买流程进行股票回购。 

代表某些高净值中国个人(作为少数股东)与公司大股东的争议中提供法律意见。

就香港联合交易所,证券及期货事务监察委员会,商业罪案调查科及财务汇报局进行的各项调查向香港上市公司及其董事提供法律意见。

就香港金融管理局进行的调查向香港一家大型银行的雇员提供意见,包括与该雇员一同参与香港金融管理局的面谈。

就香港联合交易所及公司独立委员会进行的调查向香港上市公司的董事及公司秘书提供法律意见。

就监管,合规和雇佣事项向香港一所大学提供法律意见。

为大型中国银行作为议付银行处理信用证纠纷的法律问题。

为大型中国银行作为发行银行依据法院终审,处理信用证纠纷的事宜提供法律意见。

为大型澳大利亚银行处理信用证纠纷提供法律意见。

Awards

争议解决:诉讼 - 中国(外国律所)/ 重组与破产 - 中国(外国律所)及香港

争议解决:诉讼 - 中国(外国律所)/ 重组与破产 - 中国(外国律所)及香港

争议解决:诉讼 – 香港

争议解决:诉讼 – 香港

2021 年法律 500 强诉讼国家比较指南 - 香港章节撰稿人

2021 年法律 500 强诉讼国家比较指南 - 香港章节撰稿人

Latest news & insights

15 May 2023

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter - May 2023

This is Stephenson Harwood's bi-monthly commercial litigation newsletter. With these newsletters, we hope to give you updates on interesting cases and news on various ..

More

27 Oct 2022

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter - October 2022

This is Stephenson Harwood's bi-monthly commercial litigation newsletter. With these newsletters, we hope to give you updates on interesting cases and news on various ..

More

29 Jul 2022

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter - July 2022

This is Stephenson Harwood's bi-monthly commercial litigation newsletter.

More

26 Apr 2022

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter - April 2022

This marks Stephenson Harwood's fourth commercial litigation newsletter. With these newsletters, we hope to give you updates on interesting cases and news on various a..

More

26 Apr 2022

From News

Stephenson Harwood promotes ten to partnership

Law firm Stephenson Harwood LLP has promoted ten lawyers to its partnership, effective from 1 May 2022.

More

17 Jan 2022

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter - January 2022

This marks Stephenson Harwood's third commercial litigation newsletter. With these newsletters, we hope to give you updates on interesting cases and news on various ar..

More

09 Nov 2021

From Insights

Hong Kong to end its 'fraud exception rule'

In this article we explain how and when Hong Kong will fall into line with other common law jurisdictions and abolish the fraud exception rule thereby allowing fraud v..

More

29 Oct 2021

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter – October 2021

This marks Stephenson Harwood's second commercial litigation newsletter. With these newsletters, we hope to give you updates on interesting cases and news on various a..

More

31 Aug 2021

From Insights

Commercial litigation newsletter – August 2021

This marks the first issue of Stephenson Harwood's commercial litigation newsletter. With these newsletters we hope to give you updates on interesting cases and news o..

More

24 Jun 2021

From Insights

排他性管辖权条款是否一锤定音?

在最近审理的Quaestus Capital Pte Ltd诉Everton Associates Ltd一案中,香港法院探讨了在合同约定伦敦法院享有排他性管辖权的情况下,法院是否仍应当允许当事人继续其在香港提起的诉讼这一问题。

More

21 Jun 2021

From Insights

Is an exclusive jurisdiction clause conclusive?

In the recent case of Quaestus Capital Pte Ltd v Everton Associates Ltd, the Hong Kong Court discussed whether or not the plaintiff should be allowed to continue with ..

More

30 Nov 2020

From Insights

Four recent civil cases concerning the recovery of the proceeds of fraud

In this article we explain how and why vesting orders have recently come under considerable scrutiny in Hong Kong’s High Court. Whether a fraud victim can now obtain s..

More

18 Sep 2020

From Insights

The rise of 'email fraud' and recovery litigation in Hong Kong

In view of the rapid change in the technological landscape, 'email fraud' is becoming more and more prevalent.

More

03 Sep 2020

From Insights

When a search of a mobile phone or device by the Hong Kong Police is lawful

This update is about the recent important Court of Appeal decision in SHAM WING KAN v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [2020] HKCA 186.

More

18 Jun 2020

From Insights

Actions against unknown persons

Since the anti-Extradition Bill protests in Hong Kong from March 2019, we have seen an increasing number of legal actions commenced against unknown persons.

More

05 May 2020

From Insights

Regulatory update : Hong Kong Police and ICAC search warrants

In our last update issued on 2 April 2020, we discussed the recent judgment of the Honorable Mr Justice Chow which dismissed challenges to the Securities and Futures C..

More

print-footer
logo
© Stephenson Harwood LLP 2016. Any reference to Stephenson Harwood in this document means Stephenson Harwood LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Any reference to a partner is used to refer to a member of Stephenson Harwood LLP.