Commercial litigation

Our market-leading commercial litigation department acts on a wide range of disputes for corporates, individuals and other commercial clients. We have a long-established track record of handling the most significant and complex cases. 

Our clients value our ability to handle any commercial dispute and to deliver unparalleled service in terms of quality and efficiency.
 
  • Profile
  • Experience
  • Key contacts

We advise clients in every major industry and sector, ranging from multinational corporations, financial institutions, large and medium sized companies, professionals and trustees to governments, charities, high net worth individuals and their corporate interests.

We offer commercially focused and practical solutions for complex disputes, often assisting clients with interests that cross industries, geographic locations and jurisdictions.

We regularly advise on disputes relating to commercial contracts, trade finance, corporate transactions and governance, joint-ventures, partnerships and shareholder disputes.

We also handle potentially contentious aspects of major corporate and financial transactions, political, cyber threat and sanctions issues as well as disputes involving fraud and injunctions, asset tracing and enforcement strategies.

We have litigation experts in every office who work with each other regularly, so our local lawyers can put together an international team quickly and efficiently.

Our experience means we can anticipate and prevent issues before they arise. We are also trusted to act quickly and effectively whenever urgent action is required.

"Stephenson Harwood has an exceptionally strong commercial litigation team whose lawyers are of the highest quality and totally dedicated to the pursuit of their clients’ interests. Extremely strong on international litigation and investment funds."

The Legal 500 UK 2023

Tchenguiz

In one of the largest disputes of the past decade, the ongoing multi-faceted Tchenguiz litigation, we have achieved a series of victories including securing jurisdiction against Kaupthing Bank Hf and a successful judicial review challenge against the SFO.

Rangers FC restructuring

Acting for the liquidators in relation to all aspects of the liquidation of the most successful domestic football club in the world, including high-profile and high-value litigation in England and Scotland.

Accolade Wines

Acted for Accolade Wines Limited in major dispute in relation to the defective/negligent design and construction of the largest wine production, storage and distribution facility in the UK. 

Big four accountancy firm

Acting for one of the big four accountancy firms in relation to claims of alleged negligent advice made by a commercial client against our client and a major city law firm.

Collapse of Arch-Cru funds

Acted for SPL Guernsey ICC Ltd regarding the collapse of the Arch Cru funds and the related litigation both in the UK and Guernsey including claims against the managers, directors, administrators and auditors.

Mobil v PDVSA

Successfully discharged $12 billion freezing order and brought related damages claims arising out of ICSID and ICC arbitrations between a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil and the Venezuelan state oil company.

Samuel Tak Lee

Acting for a Hong Kong tycoon defending a claim to his Tokyo commercial property portfolio, and winning on appeal in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal.  

ETI v Bolivia and Entel

Successfully discharging freezing order before the English Commercial Court and Court of Appeal in telecoms investment treaty dispute under ICSID arbitration rules involving issues of state immunity.

First Media 

Acting for an Indonesian media listco in proceedings to set aside enforcement orders made by the Hong Kong High Court in respect of Singapore arbitration awards obtained by the Malaysian conglomerate Astro.  

Probate litigation 

Acting in a probate action concerning the multi-billion dollar estate of a well-known Hong Kong entrepreneur, including testamentary capacity in the context of dementia and an application to appoint an administrator pendente lite.
Lawyer

Rovine Chandrasekera Partner

T:  +44 20 7809 2629
M:  Email Rovine | Vcard Office:  Dubai, London

Lawyer

Kate Cordery Partner

T:  +44 20 7809 2397
M:  Email Kate | Vcard Office:  London

Lawyer

Edward Davis Partner

T:  +44 20 7809 2327
M:  Email Edward | Vcard Office:  London

Lawyer

Nicolas Demigneux Paris office managing partner

T:  +33 1 44 15 80 00
M:  +33 6 70 08 35 79 Email Nicolas | Vcard Office:  Paris

Lawyer

Richard Garcia Partner

T:  +44 20 7809 2346
M:  +44 7811 409 216 Email Richard | Vcard Office:  London

Lawyer

Sue Millar Partner

T:  + 44 20 7809 2329
M:  + 44 7825 625 898 Email Sue | Vcard Office:  London

Lawyer

Ivan Ng Partner

T:  +852 2533 2840
M:  Email Ivan | Vcard Office:  Hong Kong

Lawyer

Daryll Ng Singapore office managing partner

T:  +65 6835 8656
M:  Email Daryll | Vcard Office:  Singapore

Lawyer

Evangeline Quek Office managing partner Greater China

T:  +852 2533 2799 +86 21 2250 6912
M:  +852 9222 4856 +86 136 3217 8216 Email Evangeline | Vcard Office:  Hong Kong, Shanghai

Lawyer

Nicholas Sharratt Partner

T:  +971 4407 3908
M:  +971 52 929 2265 Email Nicholas | Vcard Office:  Dubai

Latest news & insights

11 Sep 2023

From Insights

Getting through the new contract gateways in CPR 6.33(2B): Pantheon International Advisors v Co-Diagnostics

In a rare judgment on this complex topic, the court has clarified the operation of the post-Brexit gateways for service out of the jurisdiction without permission unde..

More

05 Sep 2023

From Insights

Ready for lift-off? House of Commons committee publishes review of UK's launch licensing regime

This article looks at the most pressing issues identified in the report, relevant evidence provided by some key players in the UK industry, and the recommendations sug..

More

31 Aug 2023

From Insights

Privilege in the spotlight: Al Sadeq v Dechert LLP

The recent judgment in Al Sadeq v Dechert LLP [2023] EWHC 795 (KB) provides insight into a number of interesting issues relating to legal professional privilege

More

24 Aug 2023

From Insights

Ofgem fines Morgan Stanley for failure to record and retain electronic trading communications following traders' use of Whatsapp on personal phones

We look at the first UK fine for failure to record and retain electronic communications relating to trading wholesale energy products, and ask whether this might heral..

More

16 Aug 2023

From Insights

When may an individual be liable to make restitution for regulatory breaches by their firm? The meaning of "knowingly concerned" revisited

The Financial Conduct Authority has the power to seek court-ordered restitution orders against firms, and individual "knowingly concerned" defendants in respect of reg..

More

11 Aug 2023

From News

New FCA "Dear CEO letter" sets out wide-ranging expectations and requirements in relation to Principal Trading Firms

On 4 August 2023, the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") sent a "Dear CEO letter" setting out their supervisory strategy for "Principal Trading Firms" ("PTFs"). The ..

More

04 Aug 2023

From Insights

Asymmetric jurisdiction clauses: A European conundrum - France's referral to the CJEU

Asymmetric jurisdiction clauses generally give one party - usually a bank - the liberty to choose where it brings proceedings.

More

31 Jul 2023

From Insights

We are never ever getting back together: getting termination notices right

In Topalsson GmbH v Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Ltd [2023] EWHC 1765 (TCC) the court held that the defendant ("Rolls-Royce") had validly terminated a software agreement wit..

More

13 Jul 2023

From Insights

Quincecare duty is flawed and based on a mistaken premise - Philipp v Barclays

The Supreme Court has ruled, unanimously, that the Quincecare duty does not apply where a customer has authorised its bank to make a payment. Banks are under no duty t..

More

11 Jul 2023

From Insights

Knowing when you've novated: Musst Holdings v Astra Asset Management

In Musst Holdings Ltd v Astra Asset Management UK Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 128, the Court of Appeal provided helpful guidance on when a contract will be deemed to have been..

More

11 Jul 2023

From Insights

Banks, be on inquiry - Quincecare is coming!

The Supreme Court's judgment on the scope of the Quincecare duty in Philipp v Barclays Bank UK Plc is expected imminently.

More

12 Jun 2023

From Insights

A guide to commercial litigation: a step by step approach

This guide provides an outline of the different stages in court proceedings in England and Wales

More

01 Jun 2023

From Insights

FRC consults on changes to the remuneration section of the Corporate Governance Code

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has published a consultation document putting forward various changes to the Corporate Governance Code (the Code). This article l..

More

22 May 2023

From Insights

Resolving dispute resolution disputes: when will ADR provisions be unenforceable?

In Kajima Construction Europe (UK) Ltd & Anor v Children's Ark Partnership Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 292, the Court of Appeal clarified:

More

22 May 2023

From Insights

Section 44: fig leaf or shield?

In a short but important judgment (Celestial Aviation Services Limited v Unicredit Bank AG, London Branch [2023] EWHC 1071 (Comm)), the Commercial Court has, for the f..

More

17 May 2023

From Insights

Class wars: time to legislate for hurt feelings? (Damages for data breach - Austrian Post)

In Österreichische Post AG Case C-300/21 (the Austrian Post), the CJEU has removed one of the blockers to mass data breach claims in the EU.

More

print-footer
logo
© Stephenson Harwood LLP 2016. Any reference to Stephenson Harwood in this document means Stephenson Harwood LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Any reference to a partner is used to refer to a member of Stephenson Harwood LLP.