Contact details

Harriet Campbell

T: +44 20 7809 2517 M: +44 7522 230 126 Email Harriet | vCard Office: London

LinkedIn

Harriet Campbell Senior knowledge lawyer

Contact details

Harriet Campbell

Harriet Campbell
Senior knowledge lawyer

T: +44 20 7809 2517 M: +44 7522 230 126 Email Harriet | vCard Office: London

LinkedIn
Harriet is a senior knowledge lawyer within the corporate and commercial disputes team. Harriet supports and promotes the work of the firm's finance litigation and fraud and asset recovery teams, leading the internal training and knowledge programmes and contributing to a range of internal and external publications. 
  • Profile

Harriet has experience in a broad range of complex commercial litigation and has been recognised as a Lexology Legal Influencer and featured expert in cross-border dispute resolution. She is also a member of the LexisPSL’s Case Analysis Expert Panel for Dispute Resolution.

Harriet focusses on knowledge management, training, research and supporting business development activities. She regularly contributes to articles and know-how for both external and internal clients.

Latest news & insights

30 Nov 2022

From Insights

Court of Appeal confirms reflective loss can't be recovered (Burnford v AA)

The scope of the rule against reflective loss is sufficiently certain for it to be determined on summary judgment.

More

30 Nov 2022

From Insights

Timing for e-filing: midnight or 4.30pm? (Microsoft Ireland v JJH Enterprises)

In Microsoft Ireland Operations Ltd and others v JJH Enterprises Ltd (trading as ValueLicensing) [2022] EWCA Civ 1509, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that an Appell..

More

10 Nov 2022

From Insights

Banca Intesa v Venezia: valid or void?

For the first time in the history of the Italian swaps litigation before the English courts, the Commercial Court has ruled that a swap transaction entered into in 200..

More

08 Nov 2022

From Insights

Finance litigation podcast series 2022

Welcome to our 2022 finance litigation series of four short podcasts in which we take a bite-sized look at some of the key themes emerging in financial disputes over t..

More

08 Nov 2022

From Insights

Finance litigation podcast

Welcome to our finance litigation podcast series.

More

27 Oct 2022

From Insights

Third party disclosure and service out of the jurisdiction: Gorbachev v Guriev

In Gorbachev v Guriev [2022] EWCA Civ 1270, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the English courts have the power to make an order for disclosure of documents against a..

More

27 Oct 2022

From Insights

Moving money: Bitar v Bank of Beirut and Manoukian v SGBL

In Bitar v Bank of Beirut S.A.L [2022] EWHC 2163 (QB), the High Court ordered the Bank of Beirut to effect an international transfer to its customer, Mr Bitar.

More

18 Oct 2022

From Insights

Pilot to permanent: what are the current rules on disclosure under PD57AD?

Nearly four years after it was first introduced, the Disclosure Pilot Scheme (formerly Practice Direction 51U, the Pilot) has been permanently incorporated into the Ci..

More

14 Jul 2022

From Insights

Court of Appeal gives go ahead for Fundão Dam class action (Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group)

In Município de Mariana v BHP Group UK Ltd[1] , the Court of Appeal has given permission for some 200,000 Brazilian claimants to pursue their class action for damages ..

More

07 Jul 2022

From Insights

Quincecare: duty, trigger and breach Nigeria v JP Morgan Chase Bank

In Federal Republic of Nigeria v JP Morgan Chase Bank (JPMC), the Commercial Court has provided welcome guidance about the scope of the Quincecare duty.

More

21 Jun 2022

From Insights

Contractual termination: Avoiding problems

The recent High Court claim of Lombard North Central Plc v European Skyjets Ltd [2022] EWHC 728 (QB) provides some important reminders on what may (and may not) be req..

More

13 Jun 2022

From Insights

Requests for disclosure from foreign courts: a question of compliance

In Sakab Saudi Holding Co v Al Jabri & Ors, Re: HSBC & Ors [2021] EWHC 3390 (QB), the High Court acceded to a letter of request from a Canadian court requesting the pr..

More

07 Jun 2022

From Insights

Losing the keys to the (bitcoin) kingdom: Tulip Trading v Bitcoin

In Tulip Trading Ltd v Bitcoin, Falk J considered whether developers involved with the development and custodianship of the software underlying digital assets ("Develo..

More

06 Jun 2022

From Insights

The meaning of a "person discharging managerial responsibilities" in securities fraud litigation

We look at Allianz Global Investors GmbH & Ors ("Various Investors") v G4S Ltd ("G4S").

More

26 May 2022

From Insights

A bank's duty of (Quince)care stops with its customer: RBS v JP SPC 4

In its recent judgment on the scope of the Quincecare duty, the Court of Appeal held that it was not limited to situations where the bank is instructed by its customer..

More

24 May 2022

From Insights

Revoking permission for expert evidence: Andrews v Kronospan

Expert evidence is key in providing the court with valuable insight in cases that involve technical or specialist knowledge.

More

print-footer
logo
© Stephenson Harwood LLP 2016. Any reference to Stephenson Harwood in this document means Stephenson Harwood LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Any reference to a partner is used to refer to a member of Stephenson Harwood LLP.