Contact details

Harriet Campbell

T: +44 20 7809 2517 M: +44 7522 230 126 Email Harriet | vCard Office: London

Harriet Campbell Professional support lawyer

Contact details

Harriet Campbell

Harriet Campbell
Professional support lawyer

T: +44 20 7809 2517 M: +44 7522 230 126 Email Harriet | vCard Office: London

Harriet is a professional support lawyer within the financial litigation and fraud and asset recovery teams. Harriet has significant experience in a broad range of complex commercial litigation and was a recommended lawyer in the Legal 500. She now uses that knowledge to provide critical analysis and insights for the teams she supports.
  • Profile
Harriet focusses on knowledge management, training, research and supporting business development activities. She regularly contributes to articles and know-how for both external and internal clients.

Latest news & insights

09 Apr 2021

From Insights

Give credit where credit’s due: settlement agreements and the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CFL Finance v Laser Trust & Gertner)

The Court of Appeal in CFL Finance Limited v Laser Trust & Gertner [2021] EWCA Civ 228 has ruled that a settlement agreement providing for an undisputed debt to be pa..

More

06 Apr 2021

From Insights

Adjudicator’s decision enforced under the Construction Act and the Hague Choice of Court Convention 2005

In Motacus Constructions Limited v Paolo Castelli SPA, HHJ Hodge QC gave summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator’s decision pursuant to the Construction Act, despit..

More

16 Mar 2021

From Insights

Disputes about dispute resolution clauses: keep it simple AdActive Media v Ingrouille

The Court of Appeal has ruled that an $11 million Californian judgment cannot be enforced in England because the judgment was obtained in breach of a dispute resolutio..

More

15 Mar 2021

From Insights

Minimising mistakes: the Supreme Court restricts limitation period for mistake of law claims

The Supreme Court has provided a comprehensive judgment relating to s.32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980

More

11 Mar 2021

From Insights

The Quincecare duty: what do banks need to know?

In a recent series of cases, the courts have considered the scope of the so-called Quincecare duty – or, in other words, the duty not to follow a customer’s instructio..

More

09 Mar 2021

From Insights

Inducing a subsidiary’s breach of contract: a look at the merits (Kawasaki v Kemball)

The fact that a breach of contract is the inevitable consequence of a parent company’s actions does not of itself give rise to the tort of inducing a breach of contrac..

More

08 Mar 2021

From Insights

No harm, no foul – liquidated damages clause upheld by the Commercial Court (De Havilland v Spicejet)

Sir Michael Burton GBE handed down the court’s decision in De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited v SpiceJet Limited [2021] EWHC 362 (Comm) on 23 February 2021, award..

More

25 Feb 2021

From Insights

Misrepresentation requires ‘active appreciation’—assumption is not enough (Leeds City Council and others v Barclays)

The court has struck out fraudulent misrepresentation claims brought by Leeds City Council and others against Barclays in connection with the ‘LIBOR rigging affair of ..

More

16 Feb 2021

From Insights

Knowing receipt: not what you know but what you receive

The High Court's recent judgment in Byers and others v Samba Financial Group [2021] EWHC 60 (Ch) addresses an important question in the law of knowing receipt.

More

08 Feb 2021

From Insights

Worldwide freezing orders and third parties: practical steps for claimants and third parties

Worldwide freezing orders (“WFOs”) are a crucial tool in the fight against fraud, as fraudsters will often move assets across multiple jurisdictions.

More

02 Feb 2021

From Insights

Unknown knowns, Norwich Pharmacal Orders & banks’ duties to their customers

Sometimes a claimant knows (or thinks they know) a wrongdoing has happened but either they do not have the evidence to prove it or they don’t know the identity of the ..

More

01 Feb 2021

From Insights

Marex: Where next for the rule against reflective loss?

The Supreme Court’s decision in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 of 15 July 2020 provided much needed clarity on the scope of the rule against “reflectiv..

More

20 Jan 2021

From Insights

Financial mis-selling claims: Fine Care v Natwest Markets Plc

Banks and other financial institutions selling financial products will inevitably owe their customers various duties.

More

19 Jan 2021

From Insights

Brexit and dispute resolution issues

The Brexit transition period ended on 31 December 2020. The UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement addresses many aspects of the future UK-EU relationship (including ju..

More

21 Dec 2020

From Insights

Travelport v WEX: what constitutes a material adverse effect?

In a recent judgment, the Commercial Court considered the extent to which the pandemic constitutes a material adverse effect (“MAE”) within the context of a sale and p..

More

17 Dec 2020

From Insights

In court in England with international lawyers? Your privilege is protected

In PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov and others [2020] EWHC 2437 (Comm), the English Court examined when a foreign lawyer’s advice is privileged from disclosure.

More

print-footer
logo
© Stephenson Harwood LLP 2016. Any reference to Stephenson Harwood in this document means Stephenson Harwood LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Any reference to a partner is used to refer to a member of Stephenson Harwood LLP.