Skip to main content

Home
People
Harriet Campbell

Contact details

Harriet Campbell

T: +44 20 7809 2517 M: +44 7522 230 126 Email Harriet | vCard Office: London

LinkedIn

Harriet Campbell Senior knowledge lawyer

Contact details

Harriet Campbell

Harriet Campbell
Senior knowledge lawyer

T: +44 20 7809 2517 M: +44 7522 230 126 Email Harriet | vCard Office: London

LinkedIn

Harriet is a senior knowledge lawyer within the corporate and commercial disputes team. Harriet supports and promotes the work of the firm's finance litigation and fraud and asset recovery teams, leading the internal training and knowledge programmes and contributing to a range of internal and external publications.

Profile

Harriet has experience in a broad range of complex commercial litigation and has been recognised as a Lexology Legal Influencer and featured expert in cross-border dispute resolution. She is also a member of the LexisPSL’s Case Analysis Expert Panel for Dispute Resolution.

Harriet focusses on knowledge management, training, research and supporting business development activities. She regularly contributes to articles and know-how for both external and internal clients.

Latest news & insights

16 Mar 2023

From Insights

Excluding expert evidence - a question for trial? (Fawcett v TUI)

In Fawcett & Ors v TUI UK Ltd, the High Court rejected an application to exclude expert evidence, holding that challenges to the expert's expertise and impartiality we..

10 Mar 2023

From Insights

Releasing all claims means… releasing all claims (Maranello Rosso v Lohomij BV)

In Maranello Rosso v Lohomij BV & others1 the Court of Appeal confirmed that express words are not needed to release unknown claims of fraud or dishonesty. This judgme..

09 Mar 2023

From Insights

The 'same interest' test for representative claims – a more flexible approach? (Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP)

In Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP & Anor [2023] EWHC 398 (Comm), the High Court ruled that a claim for secret commission could proceed as an 'opt-out' rep..

16 Feb 2023

From Insights

When can you terminate a contract for failing to obtain 'confirmed financing'? (Havila v Abarca)

The High Court judgment in Havila Kystruten AS v Abarca Companhia De Seguros, SA [2022] EWHC 3196 (Comm) shows how complex contractual termination claims can be, parti..

31 Jan 2023

From Insights

Is relief from liability a loss? (and other Quincecare questions): Stanford v HSBC

In Stanford International Bank Ltd v HSBC Bank PLC [2022] UKSC 34, the Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal's decision striking out almost all of Stanford's claim ..

05 Jan 2023

From Insights

Tick-box jurisdiction clause good enough for anti-suit relief

In Ebury Partners Belgium SA/NV v (1) Technical Touch BV & (2) Jan Berthels [2022] EWHC 2927 (Comm), the Commercial Court granted an anti-suit injunction ("ASI") restr..

30 Nov 2022

From Insights

Court of Appeal confirms reflective loss can't be recovered (Burnford v AA)

The scope of the rule against reflective loss is sufficiently certain for it to be determined on summary judgment.

30 Nov 2022

From Insights

Timing for e-filing: midnight or 4.30pm? (Microsoft Ireland v JJH Enterprises)

In Microsoft Ireland Operations Ltd and others v JJH Enterprises Ltd (trading as ValueLicensing) [2022] EWCA Civ 1509, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that an Appell..

10 Nov 2022

From Insights

Banca Intesa v Venezia: valid or void?

For the first time in the history of the Italian swaps litigation before the English courts, the Commercial Court has ruled that a swap transaction entered into in 200..

08 Nov 2022

From Insights

Finance litigation podcast series 2022

Welcome to our 2022 finance litigation series of four short podcasts in which we take a bite-sized look at some of the key themes emerging in financial disputes over t..

08 Nov 2022

From Insights

Finance litigation podcast

Welcome to our finance litigation podcast series.

27 Oct 2022

From Insights

Third party disclosure and service out of the jurisdiction: Gorbachev v Guriev

In Gorbachev v Guriev [2022] EWCA Civ 1270, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the English courts have the power to make an order for disclosure of documents against a..

27 Oct 2022

From Insights

Moving money: Bitar v Bank of Beirut and Manoukian v SGBL

In Bitar v Bank of Beirut S.A.L [2022] EWHC 2163 (QB), the High Court ordered the Bank of Beirut to effect an international transfer to its customer, Mr Bitar.

18 Oct 2022

From Insights

Pilot to permanent: what are the current rules on disclosure under PD57AD?

Nearly four years after it was first introduced, the Disclosure Pilot Scheme (formerly Practice Direction 51U, the Pilot) has been permanently incorporated into the Ci..

14 Jul 2022

From Insights

Court of Appeal gives go ahead for Fundão Dam class action (Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group)

In Município de Mariana v BHP Group UK Ltd[1] , the Court of Appeal has given permission for some 200,000 Brazilian claimants to pursue their class action for damages ..

07 Jul 2022

From Insights

Quincecare: duty, trigger and breach Nigeria v JP Morgan Chase Bank

In Federal Republic of Nigeria v JP Morgan Chase Bank (JPMC), the Commercial Court has provided welcome guidance about the scope of the Quincecare duty.

Useful links

Other links

Connect with us

Twitter LinkedIn

STEPHENSON HARWOOD

© Stephenson Harwood LLP 2023

print-footer

© Stephenson Harwood LLP 2016. Any reference to Stephenson Harwood in this document means Stephenson Harwood LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. Any reference to a partner is used to refer to a member of Stephenson Harwood LLP.