• Home
  • Insights
  • Hong Kong - enforcement, specific performance and public policy (G v S)

10 Jun 2021

Hong Kong - enforcement, specific performance and public policy (G v S)

Linkedin

Arbitration analysis: The Hong Kong Court of First Instance (the court) determined an application by the unsuccessful respondent (S) in a China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission arbitration seated in Mainland China (the Arbitration). An arbitral award handed down on 3 July 2020 required S to (i) continue to perform its obligations (the specific performance order) under a 2018 co-operation agreement (the Agreement); (ii) pay certain marketing costs, (iii) provide samples, and (iv) pay costs. On 25 September 2020, the court granted an enforcement order of the award in favour of the applicant (G). S applied to have the enforcement order set aside on the grounds that (i) the enforcement of the specific performance order was contrary to public policy; (ii) the other orders were outside the scope of the arbitration agreement. The court was also required to consider whether the orders contained in an arbitral award could be severable and enforced separately. The application was dismissed.

Download PDF

This analysis was first published on Lexis®PSL on 11 June 2021 and can be found 
here (subscription required). 

 
Linkedin

KEY CONTACT

Andrew Rigden Green

Andrew Rigden Green
Partner

T:  +852 2533 2761 M:  +852 6013 2520 Email Andrew | Vcard Office:  Hong Kong